Skip to content

Avoid this Pitfall When Conducting In-market Tests

Retail market or store testing has been a decision tool for many decades.  But tests are often not conducted in a manner which produces reliable results.  Care must be taken in the selection of test and control groups in making valid test versus control comparisons of the effect of the “treatment.

While test stores or markets are chosen carefully to project accurately to the broader market, not as much consideration is often given to the selection of comparison group of control stores.  See this case study of one such retailer who recognized this imbalance early on but was able to adjust the analysis to use a better, and more reliable set of control stores.

For additional insight, we asked ChatGPT 4 what it thought about the topic.  We always disclose content that is written by an AI.  What you see below is its verbatim response without additional prompting.  The case study, however, was  written by a human!


Prompt to ChatPT 4

Write a blog post, no longer than 300 words, that discusses the importance of retailers of conducting in-market tests with closely match test and control stores.


### **The Importance of Pairing Test and Control Stores in In-Market Testing**

Retailers today are continuously innovating. Whether it’s introducing new products, changing store layouts, or launching marketing campaigns, these changes can have significant financial implications. To predict how these changes might impact sales, retailers often conduct in-market tests. One of the fundamental principles of this testing is the pairing of test stores with closely matched control stores. But why is this similarity so crucial?

  1. **Validity of Results**: Matching a test store with its most similar control ensures that any external factors affecting sales are consistent across both stores. If the two stores have different sales patterns, external influences (like local events or seasonal variations) might skew the results, making it hard to determine if a change in sales was due to the test or some other variable.
  1. **Statistical Significance**: For results to be statistically significant, the test and control groups need to be as similar as possible. When stores are closely matched in terms of sales patterns, it reduces the variability between them. This means that any observed differences in sales after implementing a change can be attributed with greater confidence to that change, rather than random variations.
  1. **Better Decision Making**: Retailers make big decisions based on in-market tests. If test and control stores are not well-matched, the retailer might roll out a change thinking it will boost sales, only to find out later that the positive results were just a fluke. Conversely, they might discard a potentially beneficial change because the unmatched control store showed a misleading decline.

In conclusion, the pairing of test stores with their most similar control counterparts is a cornerstone of in-market testing. It ensures accuracy, reliability, and confidence in results, leading to better, more informed decisions. Retailers who overlook this essential step risk making costly mistakes that could have been avoided with more rigorous testing practices.

Back To Top